AISBT Reader'Do you rob temples?' (2:22) and ancient law on temple robbery
Note · Approved
Show drafts
ApprovedShowing approved records only.
historical · Rom 2:21–24 · ✓ Approved

'Do you rob temples?' (2:22) and ancient law on temple robbery

Says Paul asks the one who abhors idols, ἱεροσυλεῖς (hierosyleis), "do you rob temples?" (2:22).

Greeks ranked temple theft among the worst crimes. At Athens one law covered temple robbers and traitors: trial, no burial in Attica and confiscation (Xenophon, Hell. 1.7.22). Plato's Laws would brand, scourge and expel a foreign or slave temple robber and execute a citizen (854d–e).

Israel was to burn the nations' images and not covet their silver or gold (Deut 7:25–26). Josephus gives the law as forbidding anyone to "steal what belongs to strange temples" (Ant. 4.207); elsewhere he says Jews may not mock or revile other peoples' gods (C. Ap. 2.237). At Ephesus the clerk said Paul's companions had not "robbed our temple" (Acts 19:37).

Josephus tells of a Jewish fugitive at Rome posing as a teacher of the laws of Moses who with three partners persuaded Fulvia, a noblewoman and proselyte, to send purple and gold to the Jerusalem temple, then kept it. When her husband told Tiberius, he banished the Jews from Rome; four thousand were sent to Sardinia (Ant. 18.81–84). Tacitus places the senate's measure against Egyptian and Jewish rites in AD 19 (Ann. 2.85), and Suetonius reports the expulsion (Tib. 36); neither mentions Fulvia. This was fraud, not robbery of a shrine.

Uncertain The exact sense is debated: robbing pagan shrines, trading in their valuables, or more broadly sacrilege against God. Set beside theft and adultery (2:21–22), a literal act is likely. Fulvia's case is possible background, not an identification.

Claims

  • SaysRom 2:22 asks the one who abhors idols whether he robs temples (ἱεροσυλεῖς).
  • UncertainWhether ἱεροσυλεῖς in Rom 2:22 means robbing pagan shrines, dealing in their valuables, or sacrilege more broadly; beside theft and adultery a literal act is likely. The Fulvia affair (Josephus, Ant. 18.81–84) is possible background, not an identification.

Citations

  • SBLGNT CC BY 4.0 Rom 2:22
  • BSB public domain Rom 2:21–24; Deut 7:25–26; Acts 19:37
  • Xenophon, Hell. (Brownson) CC BY-SA 3.0 Hell. 1.7.22
  • Plato, Laws (Bury) CC BY-SA 3.0 Leg. 854d–e (penalties; the law's prelude is 854a–c)
  • Josephus (Whiston) public domain Ant. 4.207 (Whiston 4.8.10); 18.81–84 (Whiston 18.3.5)
  • Josephus, C. Ap. (Whiston) public domain C. Ap. 2.237 (Whiston 2.34)
  • Tacitus, Ann. (Church–Brodribb) public domain Ann. 2.85 (2.85.4)
  • Suetonius (Rolfe) public domain Tib. 36 (Loeb vol. 1)
Sources SBLGNT CC BY 4.0 BSB public domain Xenophon, Hell. (Brownson) CC BY-SA 3.0 Plato, Laws (Bury) CC BY-SA 3.0 Josephus (Whiston) public domain Josephus, C. Ap. (Whiston) public domain Tacitus, Ann. (Church–Brodribb) public domain Suetonius (Rolfe) public domain Bible Scholarship & Tool CC BY 4.0

Quotations from Xenophon, Hell. (Brownson) are used under CC BY-SA 3.0 · Quotations from Plato, Laws (Bury) are used under CC BY-SA 3.0 · Credits

2026-10-29

Open in Reader All notes on this passage
↑↓ move · Enter open · Esc close